I’m reading through Carmen Ebner’s PhD thesis one more time (defense coming up soon!), and it strikes me in my own writings, too, every time – the red squiggles under prescriptivism, as in the header to this post. It makes me terribly insecure: is the second r in place? What is wrong with the word, why don’t they like it, over at Microsoft?
like us on facebook
- Follow Bridging the Unbridgeable on WordPress.com
-
Join 526 other subscribers
Tags
Blogroll
- A Robert Lowth blog
- A Way with Words
- Alison Edwards
- Arnold Zwicky's Blog
- Arrant Pedantry
- Common Errors in English Usage
- David Crystal's Blog
- Genootschap Onze Taal
- Grammar Girl
- Grammar Monkeys
- Grammarianism
- HiPhiLangSci
- Jeremy Butterfield: making words work for you
- Langitudes
- Language Log
- Languagehat
- Lexicon Valley
- Lingua Franca
- Linguistics Readers Digest
- Mind Your Language
- Not One-Off Britishisms
- NWO Humanities
- On Language
- OUPblog Lexicography & Language
- Proper English Usage
- Sentence first
- Separated by a Common Language
- Sin and Syntax
- Strong Language
- The Web of Language
- Throw Grammar from the Train
- Turning over a New Leaf
- Wordlady
- World Wide Words
Microsoft thinks about what they put in their dictionary? There is a whole pile of words in Merriam-Webster’s that Microsoft claims is wrong and vice versa. Why is there no option to load a legitimate dictionary? Probaby the same reason that all of Word’s other longstanding problems aren’t fixed.
I added it to my Word dictionary long ago for just this reason.