2014/4 The dangling participle – a language myth?
- Home
- About
- English Today
- 2016/12 Prescriptivism in English literature?
- 2016/11 The Internet’s (New) Usage Problems
- 2016/10 Grammar Advice in the Age of Web 2.0
- 2016/9 Blaming the media?
- 2015/8 Microsoft Grammar and Style Checker (‘Consider Revising’)
- 2015/7 Flat adverbs: acceptable today?
- 2015/6 Literally, too big a fuss about nothing
- 2015/5 A Fuss about the Octopus
- 2014/4 The dangling participle – a language myth?
- 2014/3 Apostrophe(’)s, who needs them?
- 2014/2 Rules of engagement?
- 2014/1 Have went?
- Events
- Features
- Pravipis: the first usage guide for Slovenian
- Another Source for Burgess’s Five Hundred Mistakes of Daily Occurrence
- Legal Prescriptivism in Slovenia: a case of ipse dixit quantifier scope narrowing which helped sex offenders avoid prison time
- Linguistic prescriptivism: from dictionaries to downward dogs
- Non-native English speakers and “the new like”
- Prescriptivism in etiquette books
- “Not Grammar, Diction”
- Prescription and Prescriptivism
- Singular they: 40 years on
- Bridging Greene & Garner
- HUGE db
- Language Law & Order
- Other publications
- Podcasts
- Publications
- Sponsors
- Usage polls
Bridging the Unbridgeable 