No complaint tradition in The Netherlands? (ctd.)

I’m teaching another MA course on prescriptivism this semester, this time with the general research question as to how much of what is in the English usage guides reflects non-standard language use. All students in the course are once again expected to write blog posts on topics relating to the course that attracts their attention. Here is the first, by Emmy Stevens. 

In the blogpost No Dutch complaint tradition?, published about two years ago, an interesting comparison was drawn between the English complaint tradition and the absence of one in The Netherlands. The Dutch rarely send letters of complaint to the editors of newspapers, whereas English readers seem to get upset about language all the more quickly. Do Dutch people never complain about language at all? This seems highly unlikely, as Dutch people have complaining as one of their favourite hobbies: traffic jams, high taxes, and the weather, which is always too cold, too windy, too wet, or even too hot. But do they never complain about the Dutch language? This seems highly unlikely.

Complaining about the Dutch language? What does English have to do with this? There is in fact an interesting link here. As The Netherlands tries to be an international leader and welcomes millions of tourists every year, there is a need to be able to speak a language that is understood by more than just the thirty million people or so around the globe that speak Dutch. The language of our neighbours across the North Sea comes in handy, and during the past few decades, English has become more and more prominent in Dutch society: on television, in international companies, and in the educational system – these are just a few places where Dutch met this strong opponent.

Especially in universities and colleges, there is an ongoing debate on the usage of English. Some argue for, others against. Do we want to keep our strong position in international research and attract students from abroad? More English, please. Do we want our Dutch students to master their mother tongue at a highly proficient level? Dutch only. It is difficult to find a solution that satisfies all participants in the debate, but the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences gave it a try and published a document last summer in which they advocate more English at universities while maintaining the level of Dutch. Especially the first part of their recommendation evoked a lot of criticism, and that is where we return to the question of Dutch letters-to-the-editor.

During the past summer, De Volkskrant, a mainstream Dutch quality newspaper, published at least ten letters in which readers, including university teachers and students, pronounced themselves either for or against the use of English in Dutch higher education. The contributors who were most strongly opposed to using English felt this as a threat not only to the Dutch language, but also to Dutch society as a whole. Is English going to replace Dutch altogether? In one of the letters, Rint Sybesma, professor of Chinese linguistics at the University of Leiden, described a scenario in which we teach all of our children in English rather than Dutch. After a few generations, we would come to a situation where Dutch is completely abolished.

This letter upset quite a few readers, and Sybesma received threatening emails by people who are strong supporters of the Dutch language. Someone prescribing which language they should speak evidently aroused feelings of agitation and even hatred. However, what these people failed to understand was that Sybesma’s letter was not serious. It was just meant as an ironic contribution to the discussion. This example illustrates how easily Dutch people get upset about their language and specifically the potential threat of the English language slowly conquering the Netherlands.

Prescribing English as the language of instruction at Dutch universities to some implies that the English language is considered a better language. And that of course is something the proud Dutch do not want to admit. Dutch readers might not be as eager as the English by writing letters-to-the-editor for every language mistake they find in the newspaper, but when it comes to the hypothetical decline of the Dutch language as a whole, they are all the more eager to express their opinion in a complaint letter.

 

Posted in MA Leiden | Leave a comment

Live and Learn – our very own copy

Truly delightful to see that someone responded to my call in December last year to donate any spare usage guides to our project: many thanks indeed, Paul Nance for this wonderful gift, a copy of Live and Learn (anon., 35th enlarged ed., published in London).

Posted in news | Tagged | Leave a comment

On the late Harry Blamires …

How sad to come across his obituary in Church Times: Harry Blamires (1916-2017), who we once referred to on this blog as our oldest living usage guide writer, died on 21 November last year. The obituary lists his many achievements, and sums up what he will be remembered for. But for us he will be remembered as the author of The Queen’s English: The Essential Companion to Written English, published in 1994 and included in our HUGE database of usage guides and usage problems.

YouTube Obituary

Posted in news | Tagged , | Leave a comment

His, his or her, their

If people think singular they is a new feature in the English language, arising out of the need to express gender neutrality: it isn’t. There was already an article about the pronoun in 1975, by Ann Bodine. Very well worth reading, I find, even forty years on. But there is also a whole chapter in a novel  that deals with the issue, already in 1991: the opening chapter in Julian Barnes’s Talking it over. The usage, as the chapter shows, was already felt worthy of being defended in the the early 1990s.

In other words, it hasn’t ceased to amaze me why singular they was pronounced word of the year by the American Dialect Society in January 2016, since the form already got recognition from both scholars and literary authors long before that time. Or why people keep on complaining about its use. As Bodine argues, if the English pronoun system hadn’t been modelled on that of Latin, it would have included singular they as an alternative to he or she from the early days of the codification of grammar onwards. And from the point of view of this project, there would have been one less usage problem to bicker about. So let’s just accept it and go on using it, even in our writing.

Reference:

Bodine, Ann. 1975. Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular “they”, sex-indefinite “he”, and “he or she”’. Language in Society 4, 129-146.

Posted in usage features | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Etiquette in the 21st century …

Good to know that the etiquette guide is still going strong, and still focusing on women’s social skills:

“There is a course on ‘personal and professional impact’ for women, which emphasises body language, presentation and effective communication.”

You can read more about strange English habits in the Guardian‘s long read.

Have a good holiday!

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Season’s’ greetings and some Christmas reading

The most frequent hit on our blog at this time of the year is to Carmen Ebner’s post on the question of where to place the apostrophe (if at all) in “Season’s greeetings”. Well, here is something different for all those interested in usage guides and usage advice, and on the question of whether usage guides are ever consulted in the first place: some light and very short reading from OUP’s blog post in case you get bored over the long Christmas weekend: four days in this country! With all best wishes for the new year from all of us!

Source: negromanosphere.com

Posted in news, usage guide | 2 Comments

Language planning in the 21st century

Is this what language planning looks like in the modern world?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

British Library project discovers two new words – thanks to Guardian readers

It’s not every day you discover a new word, or at least a new meaning for an old word. But when the Guardian asked its readers to contribute their favourite dialect words, it discovered not one, but two.

“Webs” and “trabs” – both of which can mean trainers and were contributed from Liverpool – were just two of the dialectal words and phrases contributed by Guardian readers following an article about the British Library’s Evolving English WordBank.

You can see the whole article here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

We proudly announce …

… the publication of the second major collection of papers from the Bridging the Unbridgeable project, which appeared yesterday!

 

Thanks to all authors for their wonderful contributions: copies are on their way and should reach you soon. We also very grateful to all the people at OUP who helped to make this publication possible. And for anyone interested in the book’s topic: please order your copy from OUP.

Posted in news | Leave a comment

HUGE recommended

A first mention of the HUGE database, in the journal Copypediting: thanks to Lauren Nalls for telling us about it!

Posted in news | Leave a comment